Vid Con 2018 Review

, and uniform.css sizes any
main h1 at the page-title scale (.definitive-interior main h1), so
one landed mid-read at 60px. The cap carries the page class to out-
specify that rule, and covers the whole family at reading scale. */
.blog-page .blg-wrap .blg-body h1, .blog-page .blg-wrap .blg-body h2,
.blog-page .blg-wrap .blg-body h3, .blog-page .blg-wrap .blg-body h4 { margin: 2rem 0 0.75rem; font-family: "Playfair Display", Georgia, serif; font-weight: 400; line-height: 1.3; color: rgb(244 241 235 / 0.95); text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; max-width: none; }
.blog-page .blg-wrap .blg-body h1, .blog-page .blg-wrap .blg-body h2 { font-size: clamp(1.15rem, 1rem + 0.8vw, 1.45rem); }
.blog-page .blg-wrap .blg-body h3 { font-size: clamp(1.05rem, 0.95rem + 0.55vw, 1.3rem); }
.blog-page .blg-wrap .blg-body h4 { font-size: clamp(1rem, 0.95rem + 0.3vw, 1.12rem); }
/* A photo run is not a paragraph - it breaks out past the reading
measure to ONE width token and packs like the photography archive.
CSS columns balanced the run into three ragged stacks: a column ran
long and dangled a photograph below the others, a wide frame overran
the square its neighbours implied, and a hole opened where the last
short column stopped. The rows are JUSTIFIED instead - solved at
build time in galleryize.py, shipped as explicit flex rows.
A cell's --a is its native aspect. flex-grow:var(--a) over a zero
basis hands each photo in a row the width a_i x h out of the row's
free space, so every photo in the row stands at the same height h
and the last one lands exactly on the right edge - flush left AND
right, nothing cropped, no measurement on the page. */
.blg-body { --blg-wide: min(68rem, 92vw); --blg-gap: 0.62rem; }
.blg-gallery { width: var(--blg-wide); margin: 2rem 0 2.2rem; margin-inline: calc(50% - var(--blg-wide) / 2); display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: var(--blg-gap); }
.blg-row { display: flex; column-gap: var(--blg-gap); width: var(--rw, 100%); margin-inline: auto; }
.blg-nb { display: none; }
.blg-gallery .blg-cell { flex-grow: var(--a, 1); flex-shrink: 1; flex-basis: 0; min-width: 0; aspect-ratio: var(--a, 1.5); margin: 0; padding: 0; overflow: hidden; border-radius: 0.3rem; background: #0b0d12; cursor: pointer; opacity: 0; transform: translateY(18px); transition: opacity 620ms cubic-bezier(0.22, 0.61, 0.21, 1), transform 740ms cubic-bezier(0.22, 0.61, 0.21, 1); }
.blg-gallery .blg-cell.is-in { opacity: 1; transform: none; }
.blg-gallery .blg-cell img { display: block; width: 100%; height: 100%; object-fit: cover; margin: 0; border-radius: 0; opacity: 0.86; transition: transform 760ms cubic-bezier(0.22, 0.61, 0.21, 1), opacity 420ms ease; }
.blg-gallery .blg-cell:hover img, .blg-gallery .blg-cell:focus-visible img { opacity: 1; transform: scale(1.02); }
.blg-gallery .blg-cell:focus-visible { outline: 1px solid var(--kls-accent, #fb5607); outline-offset: 2px; }
/* the run measures itself against the article COLUMN, so the index
rail simply narrows it - no second width rule for the railed page */
@supports (container-type: inline-size) {
.blg-wrap { container-type: inline-size; }
.blg-body { --blg-wide: min(68rem, 100cqw); }
}
/* The phone keeps the grid - 2-up rows out of the same packer at a
smaller row height, never one full-screen photograph per screen.
The desktop rows dissolve (display:contents) and the build-time
narrow breaks drive the lines instead, so one set of photographs
serves both plans. */
@media (max-width: 760px) {
.blg-body { --blg-gap: 0.5rem; }
.blg-gallery { flex-direction: row; flex-wrap: wrap; column-gap: var(--blg-gap); row-gap: 0; margin-bottom: 1.8rem; }
.blg-row { display: contents; }
.blg-nb { display: block; flex: 0 0 100%; height: var(--blg-gap); }
}
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { .blg-gallery .blg-cell { opacity: 1; transform: none; transition: none; } }
/* A short line stranded between two photo runs read as a fragment
someone forgot to delete. It is the author's own beat - so it is set
as one: centred, given air on both sides, a step up in scale. The
builder finds it; not a word of it is moved or rewritten. */
.blg-body .blg-beat { margin: clamp(2.4rem, 5.5vh, 3.6rem) auto; max-width: 34rem; text-align: center; }
.blg-body .blg-beat p, .blg-body .blg-beat div { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; }
/* Squarespace put white-space:pre-wrap INLINE on these paragraphs, so
the source indent after each printed as a real leading space
and every line after the first sat 3px right of centre. pre-line
keeps the author's line breaks and drops the indentation; it has to
out-rank an inline style, hence the !important, and it is scoped to
the beat alone. No character of the copy changes. */
.blg-body .blg-beat p { margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0.4rem; white-space: pre-line !important; font-family: "Playfair Display", Georgia, serif; font-size: clamp(1.2rem, 1rem + 1vw, 1.65rem); line-height: 1.4; color: rgb(244 241 235 / 0.94); }
.blg-body .blg-beat p:last-child { margin-bottom: 0; }
/* end blg-gallery */

Skip to content

← All Posts
Jun 29, 2018·1 min read
Vid Con 2018 Review

In this video Kal Visuals discuss Vid Con and if it is worth the price you pay to go. Kal Visuals discuss every aspect of Vid Con from logistics and operations to how engaging/rewarding the keynote speakers were. In this Vid Con 2018 review, kal visuals reveals both the positive and negative takeaways from going to Vid Con as a photographer and/or filmmaker that is trying to grow their business, brand and audience on YouTube as well as the other various social media platforms. Kal Visuals discuss the tech companies that went to Vid Con, what industry insight were available and what announcements were made like the launch of IGTV at Vid Con 2018. Kal Visuals tells all in this honest review of his Vid Con 2018 experience from the networking opportunities to the fun events going on at night like “dance the night” at the YouTube area. If you’re contemplating Vid Con for 2019 then look no further than this Vid Con 2018 review!

http://www.kyleloftusstudios.com